Home Forums Gamescan Chat42 About
* Login   * Register * FAQ    * Search
It is currently Thu 03-28-2024 4:03AM

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: More space missions
PostPosted: Thu 06-24-2004 10:11PM 


Source: Somewhere
Just saw this on CNN.com after following the link from Seek's main page:

Quote:
BUSH SPACE INITIATIVE
- Spend $12 billion on new space exploration plan over next five years. $1bn will be new money, the rest reallocated from existing NASA programs.
- Retire shuttle program by 2010
- Develop new manned exploration vehicle
- Launch manned mission to moon between 2015 and 2020
- Build permanent lunar base as "stepping stone" for more ambitious missions
- Complete commitments to international space station by 2010
Source: White House


Sounds like a great idea to me. What about the rest of you people?


Top
  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 06-25-2004 7:23AM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Sun 11-09-2003 1:35AM
Posts: 1145
Location: novus cella

Source: Triangle
About fucking time, we should have already stepped on Mars.

_________________
\\grass

http://www.aperturescience.com/


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 06-25-2004 8:00PM 
Offline
Major
User avatar

Joined: Fri 08-22-2003 5:31PM
Posts: 243
Location: Swimmer House

Source: Off Campus
I smell jobs and money for engineers, that makes me happy

-Ziggy


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun 06-27-2004 11:16AM 
Offline
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Fri 02-15-2002 12:09AM
Posts: 125
Location: Peoria, IL

Source: Fidelity
Looks good, throwing away the shuttle makes the original money much more useful. So take the new 1$bn, and put it up for grabs. I don't remember where I saw the idea, probably /., but run with the prizes idea. Get results.

1 Billion USD for 25 kilos of martian soil, delivered. It excites invention and development in the cost efficient public sector, it gets results, the stuff the scientists want, instead of abstract development, and NASA only pays for shit that works.

Every year, one new prize or 10x100$mn prizes, or any combination. I think it's the way to go.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun 06-27-2004 2:31PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Fri 01-24-2003 7:13PM
Posts: 1652
Location: down the hill

Source: Off Campus
investment in space technology has averaged a 600% return (in spinoffs, to society) since the beginning of space research. no particular company benefits as much as society as a whole, so one might say that space technology research is about the best investment we can make for society.

_________________
heretic^ stars as Samuel Jackson in the summer's newest thriller: Owls on a Forum!

http://web.umr.edu/~ikellogg/heretic%5E-owls.gif


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun 06-27-2004 3:36PM 
Offline
Major General

Joined: Sat 03-09-2002 12:57PM
Posts: 2026

Source: Sigma Nu
i did my sophomore (high school) research paper on space travel, i think it's a totally worthwhile venture. the thing that i liked the most on the list is the manned mission to moon. man stepped foot on the moon in the 60s and we haven't been back since. i think it's about time to tear up some moon gravel with the buggy and smash some golf balls around... and imagine the pictures and video we will see from it! camera technology has increased a lot since then i'm smelling omnimax movie that woudl rock


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun 06-27-2004 4:45PM 
Offline
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Fri 02-15-2002 12:09AM
Posts: 125
Location: Peoria, IL

Source: Fidelity
the naked prophet wrote:
investment in space technology has averaged a 600% return (in spinoffs, to society) since the beginning of space research. no particular company benefits as much as society as a whole, so one might say that space technology research is about the best investment we can make for society.


Agreed. Computers, velcro, steel belted radials (found on the most expensive 4x4 ever built, battery powered, and still sitting on the moon). Space flight requires great things, small, light, and with as close to 0 failure rate as possible. Great research and products are the result.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun 06-27-2004 5:43PM 


Source: Somewhere
They even have duct tape up there on the moon.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040417.html


Top
  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun 06-27-2004 5:44PM 


Source: Somewhere
Dave D. wrote:
Looks good, throwing away the shuttle makes the original money much more useful. So take the new 1$bn, and put it up for grabs. I don't remember where I saw the idea, probably /., but run with the prizes idea. Get results.

1 Billion USD for 25 kilos of martian soil, delivered. It excites invention and development in the cost efficient public sector, it gets results, the stuff the scientists want, instead of abstract development, and NASA only pays for shit that works.

Every year, one new prize or 10x100$mn prizes, or any combination. I think it's the way to go.


That was the idea with the X Prize, and SpaceShipOne has already almost won it. Apparently, it was effective.


Top
  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat 07-10-2004 3:23AM 
Offline
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Fri 02-15-2002 12:09AM
Posts: 125
Location: Peoria, IL

Source: Fidelity
Anonymous wrote:
That was the idea with the X Prize, and SpaceShipOne has already almost won it. Apparently, it was effective.


Yes, but the X-Prize was a private group offering the money, reminiscent of the cash prizes awarded for flying achievements in the last century. (Trans-Atlantic flight a la Limburgh anyone?)

I think that the government doing the same thing. Current government contracts are sweet deals. Tough to lose, usually not too difficult to get, but once you have one, you have a sugar daddy. Instead, contests pay for results, not trials.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat 07-10-2004 5:00PM 
Offline
Major
User avatar

Joined: Tue 03-09-2004 9:50PM
Posts: 312

Source: TJ South
Actually no, the X Prize requires that it is a privately funded spaceship that launches twice within 2 weeks AND carries 3 people along with it. SpaceShipOne only carried the pilot and the the makers of it have no plans of converting it so it is possible to take 3 people up.

_________________
"Have regard for your name, for it will remain longer than a great store of gold."
-Ecclesiasticus

"When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends."
-Japanese Proverb


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun 07-11-2004 12:29AM 


Source: Somewhere
FuzzyLogic wrote:
Actually no, the X Prize requires that it is a privately funded spaceship that launches twice within 2 weeks AND carries 3 people along with it. SpaceShipOne only carried the pilot and the the makers of it have no plans of converting it so it is possible to take 3 people up.


Not three people, but instead the equivalent mass of three people. And in just a little while, SpaceShipOne does plan on doing that, since winning the X-Prize was its whole goal in the first place.


Top
  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun 07-11-2004 7:59PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Fri 01-24-2003 7:13PM
Posts: 1652
Location: down the hill

Source: Off Campus
gee whiz everybody, read about it for yourselves: http://www.xprize.org/

rules: http://www.xprize.org/teams/guidelines.html

and i'm sure everyone knows their way around a webpage.

info tidbit: nobody at nasa likes burt rutan. he's not terribly popular.

_________________
heretic^ stars as Samuel Jackson in the summer's newest thriller: Owls on a Forum!

http://web.umr.edu/~ikellogg/heretic%5E-owls.gif


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 07-29-2004 5:40PM 
Offline
Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Thu 02-26-2004 8:37PM
Posts: 24
Location: Beech Street

Source: Off Campus
Bush's space plan really is a great idea, and it's about time a president started trying to get NASA's ass back in gear. There are a few drawbacks though. First of all, the 12 billion dollar budget he's set for it is probably going to end up being quite a bit less than is actually needed. The big problem though is trying to make the majority of the nation see that starting more manned space missions is going to help society as a whole in the long run. We're engineers, so of course we can see how this kind of stuff is going to help us in terms of new jobs, new technological innovations, etc.. But try going to some small town farmer and tell him how his paying tax money to send some people to the Moon and possibly Mars will benefit him, and you'd get nowhere fast.

Basically, during the 60's-70's, the government was able to use patriotism to get the nation to back them on their space plans with the whole mentality of everyone wanting to beat the Russians. Today, however, with most space plans being international endeavours, there will more than likely be many problems in "inspiring" some of the nation into siding with this plan.

_________________
"You're not quite evil enough. You're semi-evil. You're quasi-evil. You're the margarine of evil. You're the Diet Coke of evil, just one calorie, not evil enough." - [Dr. Evil]


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 08-26-2004 5:01PM 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Sun 02-01-2004 3:51PM
Posts: 7

Source: Off Campus
Why build a base on the moon?? I mean, yes the moon is cool and all. And it would be cool to be able to live on it, but wasn't the whole point of the ISS to be a stepping stone for further space exploration. Much easier to build large space craft in orbit then in another gravity field. I mean anyone can through out some dates for the near future and make any claims they want, but i think we should just concentrate on what we have already commited to doing.

BTW we usually pay 80-90% of the costs for "international" programs. Doesn't really seem to international to me.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group