Joined: Mon 11-17-2003 12:27AM Posts: 3128 Location: The Bat Cave
Source: VPN
(1) "Deviate sexual intercourse" means any act involving the genitals of one person and the mouth, tongue, or anus of another person or a sexual act involving the penetration, however slight, of the male or female sex organ or the anus by a finger, instrument or object done for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person;
Section 566.064 Statutory sodomy, second degree
1. A person commits the crime of statutory sodomy in the second degree if being twenty-one years of age or older, he has deviate sexual intercourse with another person who is less than seventeen years of age.
2. Statutory sodomy in the second degree is a class C felony.
If this wasn't forcible, I have much less problem with the "Deviate sexual intercourse" than with the child porn (which was probably this girl's pictures so again...) Now, if I were her father, I would definitely be ready to string the fucker up, and even now I think it is awful, but lets face it, on the list of awful things people do, this isn't high up there (again, I am not defending this guy, just saying if neither of the females were coerced in any way, than this barely ranks on the horror totem pole...) I would be interested to hear the entire story, but from what I can extract, it seems as though this guy did something stupid, and needs to be punished, but it really doesn't sound like he is a rapist or pedophile (again, just what I have gleened from the newspaper article/eConnection email...)
_________________ Carney Institute of Technology
Why not outlaw MURDER instead of trying to outlaw guns?
Joined: Fri 01-24-2003 7:13PM Posts: 1652 Location: down the hill
Source: MST Wireless
I don't think what he did was too bad. How many of you guys would want to have a threesome with 16 and 18 year old girls? But he's a police officer, and knew the law, and should have obeyed it.
There are plenty of things that are illegal which I think should not be against the law - however, it is the law, and I expect those who are supposed to be enforcing the law, to obey it.
_________________ heretic^ stars as Samuel Jackson in the summer's newest thriller: Owls on a Forum!
Joined: Fri 09-05-2003 10:24AM Posts: 3589 Location: Oklahoma! Where the wind comes sweeping down the p l a i n s !
Source: MST-WPA Wireless
the naked prophet wrote:
There are plenty of things that are illegal which I think should not be against the law - however, it is the law, and I expect those who are supposed to be enforcing the law, to obey it.
This is exactly where I have a problem with this situation. I see all to often oficers that abuse their power (running red lights with emergency lights on only through the intersection, just mostly small stuff), and it irks me to no end. This, however, takes the cake. Any officer that knowingly breaks the law like this should be grilled a bit more than the average citizen.
_________________ Ever get that feeling of deja vu?
right, which is why i balked at their article. either the article was relying on Missouri Miner reporting techniques (make shit up or plagiarise wikipedia, then edit it over AIM) or we're all fucked
i lean towards the former.
_________________
BigPeeOn wrote:
Here's the deal: chemistry is the devil. Anything beyond balancing an chemical equation is black magic.
Joined: Sun 08-15-2004 9:36PM Posts: 4957 Location: ~~~~\o/~~~~~
Source: McNutt Hall
Since this got bumped would just like to say the miner once again sucks.
Headline "Former UMRPD officer arrested" he is not a former officer, to be technical he is still a current officer pending investigation. Much of the article seems cut and paste from rolla daily news, which is well......not a source to copy from.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum