Home Forums Gamescan Chat42 About
* Login   * Register * FAQ    * Search
It is currently Fri 01-02-2026 1:48PM

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Is the option for private accounts a good idea?
Yes 53%  53%  [ 23 ]
No 46%  46%  [ 20 ]
Total votes : 43
Author Message
 Post subject: Social Security
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 6:12PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08-17-2004 3:04PM
Posts: 1671
Location: GBH

Source: Wilson Library
Bush gave a speech, any thoughts?

_________________
The solution of this problem is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 6:35PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Thu 03-20-2003 7:56PM
Posts: 1149
Location: Berth's Garage, Pearl Avenue

Source: TJ North
HE CAN TALK?!!!?!?!?!??!!!

_________________
"Clear? Huh! Why a four-year-old child could understand this report! ... Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head or tail out of it." - Rufus T. Firefly, Duck Soup


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 6:37PM 
Offline
Gun Hater
User avatar

Joined: Fri 09-03-2004 1:27PM
Posts: 2748
Location: 752 TJ

Source: TJ South
lets get this out of the way...

"Democrats are liberal pussies"

"Republicans are ignorant bastards"

and move on to real discussion...

_________________
And the tongue is a flame of fire. It is full of wickedness that can ruin your whole life. It can turn the entire course of your life into a blazing flame of destruction, for it is set on fire by hell itself.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 6:39PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Thu 03-20-2003 7:56PM
Posts: 1149
Location: Berth's Garage, Pearl Avenue

Source: TJ North
Phil the tame goat wrote:
lets get this out of the way...

"Democrats are liberal pussies"

"Republicans are ignorant bastards"

and move on to real discussion...


Fiscally, it seems to be the other way around these days.

_________________
"Clear? Huh! Why a four-year-old child could understand this report! ... Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head or tail out of it." - Rufus T. Firefly, Duck Soup


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 6:46PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08-17-2004 3:04PM
Posts: 1671
Location: GBH

Source: Wilson Library
Phil the tame goat wrote:
lets get this out of the way...

"Democrats are liberal pussies"

"Republicans are ignorant bastards"

and move on to real discussion...


ok, yes, now that the name calling is out of the way, I was just wondering if anyone had thoughts on the plan/better ideas/anything else. I honestly doubt I will get a SS check, so I'm all for the private investing to keep as much of my money away from the government as possible.

_________________
The solution of this problem is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 6:50PM 
Offline
Major General
User avatar

Joined: Mon 09-01-2003 6:23PM
Posts: 2880
Location: Either at the source below, or in 859 TJ south

Source: Wilson Library
Ya, but if the market crashes, yer boned.

Social Security should be kept around, but retooled so it still works.

_________________
The nicest asshole you probably wish you had never met.

Remember, Jesus loves you...but he doesn't put out.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 6:54PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08-17-2004 3:04PM
Posts: 1671
Location: GBH

Source: Wilson Library
Even if the market crashes, I plan on have at least some of my money in t-bills or bonds. and honestly, i trust the market to give me a better return than the government. it is a risk, but one i will take.

_________________
The solution of this problem is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 7:18PM 
Offline
Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Tue 09-23-2003 10:39PM
Posts: 957
Location: Tampa...Possibly Houston Soon

Source: Off Campus
Sczroer wrote:
Ya, but if the market crashes, yer boned.


REALLY?!?!?!

So how many congressmen/congresswomen did you see panhandling for change when the tech bubble burst? The government gives their own employees this retirement plan of investing and I doubt they were "boned" by it. Its not like the private accounts are daytrading accounts. They don't just give joe blow a check and say, "go make it bigger." The vast majority of the options are little to nearly no risk. Further to the point, when the market crashes, we're ALL boned.

_________________
"...there is no limit to what a man can do or where he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit."
--Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 7:53PM 
Offline
Sergeant

Joined: Mon 10-11-2004 7:13PM
Posts: 46

Source: TJ South
An easy fix to the social security problem would be to just eliminate the $90,000 taxable salary cap for the payroll tax that funds social security.

Now I know that people will say "those people over $90K will be so rich that they wont draw nearly as much in benefits in proportion to how much they would be paying." But so what. Pay your taxes like everyone else. Besides, if i have to either feel sorry for some old guy on SS or someone making a whole lot of money who has to pay a little bit more on their taxes, I'd rather have to feel sorry for the rich guy.

They could also reinstate the inheritance tax and use that money to fund social security. Then they'd only be taking money from dead people.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 8:07PM 
Offline
Major

Joined: Wed 03-19-2003 12:40AM
Posts: 343

Source: Delta Tau Delta
They should privatize Social Security, and by privatize I mean tax me less so I can invest on my own. I don't need to be babysat.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 8:12PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08-17-2004 3:04PM
Posts: 1671
Location: GBH

Source: Wilson Library
sdodd wrote:
They should privatize Social Security, and by privatize I mean tax me less so I can invest on my own. I don't need to be babysat.


i concur, I cant find a good reason NOT to instate privatization. If there is one, please enlighten me.

_________________
The solution of this problem is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 9:25PM 
Offline
Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Thu 02-13-2003 4:01PM
Posts: 533
Location: dem hills

Source: Farrar Hall
or we can just do what Allen Greenspan said and quit taking money out of SS to pay for other stuff...

_________________
If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.

~Sir Isaac Newton


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 11:14PM 
Offline
Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Tue 09-23-2003 10:39PM
Posts: 957
Location: Tampa...Possibly Houston Soon

Source: Off Campus
Rigaku wrote:
or we can just do what Allen Greenspan said and quit taking money out of SS to pay for other stuff...


That still won't fix the problem, just prolong its solvency. It will still go into the red in 2017 (when the government will begin to repay the money it borrowed from the program) and the bottom will still fall out 40 years or so later.

_________________
"...there is no limit to what a man can do or where he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit."
--Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 04-28-2005 11:37PM 
Offline
Sergeant

Joined: Mon 10-11-2004 7:13PM
Posts: 46

Source: TJ South
A non-privatized social security is the only system that makes sense. The system is not designed to give the rich a retirement plan. Its designed to give the poor people enough money to live off of once they can no longer work or decide that its enough to get by on that they can retire. If you are gonna just make privatized accounts, you might as well just reduce the ammount of money you pay into social security and simultaneously slash the benefits to match the ammount being paid into it. It seems stupid to pay money into social security and have them invest it in the stock market, when you could just invest it yourself.

In my opinion, privatized accounts are not about saving social security. it seems like they are just designed so that rich people can get more of their money back out of a system designed to help the poor. But I may just be misunderstanding what the plan is.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 04-29-2005 2:12AM 
Offline
Major

Joined: Fri 11-16-2001 5:40AM
Posts: 445

Source: Fidelity
Lopez wrote:
An easy fix to the social security problem would be to just eliminate the $90,000 taxable salary cap for the payroll tax that funds social security.

Now I know that people will say "those people over $90K will be so rich that they wont draw nearly as much in benefits in proportion to how much they would be paying." But so what. Pay your taxes like everyone else. Besides, if i have to either feel sorry for some old guy on SS or someone making a whole lot of money who has to pay a little bit more on their taxes, I'd rather have to feel sorry for the rich guy.

They could also reinstate the inheritance tax and use that money to fund social security. Then they'd only be taking money from dead people.


I agree. Make rich people pay and/or and raise the retirement age, make sense to me.

Lopez wrote:
A non-privatized social security is the only system that makes sense. The system is not designed to give the rich a retirement plan. Its designed to give the poor people enough money to live off of once they can no longer work or decide that its enough to get by on that they can retire. If you are gonna just make privatized accounts, you might as well just reduce the ammount of money you pay into social security and simultaneously slash the benefits to match the ammount being paid into it. It seems stupid to pay money into social security and have them invest it in the stock market, when you could just invest it yourself.

In my opinion, privatized accounts are not about saving social security. it seems like they are just designed so that rich people can get more of their money back out of a system designed to help the poor. But I may just be misunderstanding what the plan is.


I agree. The system was designed to be a non-ownership system (anyone have grandparents who chose not to take social security money?, ask around I'm sure you'll find someone, and ask them why?), making it ownership now does make no sense, as sdodd said, "They should privatize Social Security, and by privatize I mean tax me less so I can invest on my own. I don't need to be babysat." I think of it as a collectively good system, atleast as a last resort for many people, What do other countries have? other than the food stamp/medicaid equivalents.


Top
 Profile  
    
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group