Home Forums Gamescan Chat42 About
* Login   * Register * FAQ    * Search
It is currently Thu 08-21-2025 10:40PM

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: mathematica vs. maple vs. mathcad
PostPosted: Thu 01-26-2006 10:20PM 
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Fri 09-24-2004 4:37PM
Posts: 79
Location: holtman

Source: Holtman Hall
anyone have experiance with more than one of these math programs? I have been using mathcad a lot but would be interested in learning mathematica or maple if they are significantly better. I am mainly interested in the program's formatting ability, for text, not just for equations.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 01-26-2006 10:48PM 
Offline
Admiral Fgt of the SS Queer
User avatar

Joined: Sun 08-15-2004 10:37AM
Posts: 2408

Source: RC I
i use my brain

_________________
"Jesus is never mad at us if we live with him in our hearts!"
"I hate to break it to you, but he is--he most definitely is."
The word "bi-partisan" usually means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 01-26-2006 11:16PM 
Offline
Colonel

Joined: Sun 05-01-2005 4:29PM
Posts: 501

Source: TJ North
LaTex does formatting...never actually used it though


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 01-27-2006 1:10AM 
Offline
Major General
User avatar

Joined: Sat 10-18-2003 10:26PM
Posts: 2955
Location: Stone's throw from Garden of the Gods, Colorado Springs

Source: Off Campus
squishypickle wrote:
LaTex does formatting...never actually used it though


It shows.

Maple is very powerful, very adaptable, and happens to be the math package of choice at UMR. Mathematica is about 90% as powerful as Maple and (usually) formats the answer into something a person would be likely to obtain. That way you don't have to go proving identities to show that your answer is identical to the Maple answer.

It all depends on the application. I'd use Maple because it's installed all over campus and it's what I'm most familiar with.

_________________
It's still UMR to me, dammit.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 01-27-2006 6:53AM 
Offline
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Sat 06-19-2004 5:54PM
Posts: 144

Source: Off Campus
I liked mathcad better, but I really hate the stupid little quirks that all programs have with them. Just some tiny things killed these giant equations I had to do (also if you can't get it to work after hours on end, there isn't much in what you typed so it looks like you did next to nothing). But its a great feeling to jump up and laugh and cry at 3 am in the morning when your graphs and equations finally work out...

_________________
You can't spell Slaughter without Laughter.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 01-27-2006 12:12PM 
Offline
Major
User avatar

Joined: Wed 01-19-2005 7:55PM
Posts: 261
Location: Dagobah

Source: Off Campus
What type of mathematics are we talking about here?

If you already have solutions and simply want the ability to pretty-print equations and intermix them with text, LaTeX *is* worth a gander. Here's a getting-started page: http://azariah.cgore.com:8080/latex/index.html

NOTE: Chris Gore is a CS grad. student here at UMR, and I'm willing to bet he would answer any questions you can't easily locate via Google.

Sometimes it's easier to weild several tools in combination instead of one big tool that "does everything". For example, if I were doing numerical analysis, I'd stick to paper and MATLAB. MATLAB scripts have a straightforward syntax that's ideal for computations with matrices and vectors. Solve a problem on paper -> prototype your solution in MATLAB (you can later move to the MATLAB C++ Math Library if you need additional speed) -> then write-up your results using LaTeX.

_________________
In Soviet Russia, Sparta is this!


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 01-27-2006 12:48PM 
Offline
Colonel

Joined: Sun 05-01-2005 4:29PM
Posts: 501

Source: Wilson Library
Matlab is the preferred engineering math tool from what I understand.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 01-27-2006 3:47PM 
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Fri 09-24-2004 4:37PM
Posts: 79
Location: holtman

Source: Holtman Hall
thanks for all the info. after installing mathcad, maple 9, maple 10, and mathematica, it seems that Maple 10 is the clear winner for me. Maple 10 has a new feature (Document Mode) which is exactly what I was looking for. Basically a word processor with math display and solving abilities, so I can solve and type up my homework and lab reports at the same time, and this will eventually be much faster than handwriting homework and writeups (because, at least for me, I go much slower when I am trying to write neatly).


Top
 Profile  
    
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group