Home Forums Gamescan Chat42 About
* Login   * Register * FAQ    * Search
It is currently Sat 11-22-2025 8:53PM

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: UMR HIspeed internet connection Latency
PostPosted: Tue 08-22-2006 4:56PM 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Tue 08-15-2006 4:23PM
Posts: 7

Source: Nagogami
Hi
What is with the latency of the UMR internet? Its data transfer speed is awesome(3mb up and down), but the latency is about 160ms averge even on the fastest sites(with a ethernet cable connected to the thingnamagig on the wall). Here is my traceroute(to google.com).
Code:
Pinging google.com [64.233.167.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=241

Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 148ms, Maximum = 149ms, Average = 148ms


Code:

1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
2   163 ms   117 ms   120 ms  131.151.152.254
3   118 ms   117 ms   118 ms  nchc-90-rtr.network.umr.edu [131.151.251.102]
4   118 ms   118 ms   118 ms  umr-havener-gi0-1.gw.more.net [131.151.251.70]
5   130 ms   127 ms   127 ms  sl-r10-01-sr5-0-1.mo.more.net [150.199.169.113]

6   137 ms   145 ms   129 ms  sl-r12-01-ge4-1.mo.more.net [150.199.7.41]
7   157 ms   150 ms   148 ms  chi-edge-20.inet.qwest.net [67.128.225.65]
8   147 ms   158 ms   147 ms  chi-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.20.181]
9   171 ms   174 ms   166 ms  dcx-core-01.inet.qwest.net [67.14.32.2]
10   175 ms   169 ms   167 ms  dcx-edge-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.251.14]
11   167 ms   178 ms   171 ms  72.165.86.2
12   168 ms   173 ms   167 ms  209.85.130.14
13   169 ms   168 ms   182 ms  72.14.238.97
14   184 ms   184 ms   184 ms  72.14.236.175
15   185 ms   200 ms   198 ms  216.239.49.226
16   184 ms   186 ms   199 ms  72.14.236.175
17   235 ms   184 ms   188 ms  216.239.49.226
18   187 ms   183 ms   183 ms  64.233.187.99



The first jump is to my router, no biggy.
Notice the 2nd jump just boosted it to the 120s.
I live in Nagogami btw.
Can anyone spare some tips about this and to decrease the latency under the 100s?

Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue 08-22-2006 8:00PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Sun 08-24-2003 3:47PM
Posts: 1049
Location: Behind YOU!

Source: Kelly Hall
The Nag apartments are serviced by a University hosted DSL system. Basically, tell everyone else to get off, in the entire complex.

_________________
"Why is it that we must always choose between certain death and probable death?" ~ Clank, Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue 08-22-2006 10:51PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Mon 07-26-2004 3:11PM
Posts: 1420

Source: Fidelity
I remember that DSL. It sucked. Bad.

_________________
Don't do drugs because if you do drugs you'll go to prison, and drugs are really expensive in prison.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed 08-23-2006 2:39PM 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Tue 08-15-2006 4:23PM
Posts: 7

Source: Nagogami
WhtHawk wrote:
The Nag apartments are serviced by a University hosted DSL system. Basically, tell everyone else to get off, in the entire complex.


Thanks...


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 08-24-2006 7:18PM 
Offline
Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Wed 08-24-2005 2:44PM
Posts: 620

Source: TJ South
In TJ, the worst part is that the line from the room to the switchting cabinet has only 4 coppers...half duplexing.

_________________
It seems the white trash of the internet has arrived.
http://rsaxvc.net


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 08-25-2006 12:05AM 
Offline
Major

Joined: Wed 08-18-2004 6:51PM
Posts: 246

Source: Kelly Hall
That's pretty cruddy.

My hop to nchc-90-rtr.network.umr.edu (131.151.251.102) is 2ms, 4ms, 2ms.

Its the first hop that's doing you in, the one to 131.151.152.254


My last hop to google is 72.14.207.99 right now, and its 60ms. Its about 60 miliseconds from 131.151.152.254 to google, so its likely whatever the heck is going on between your router and 131.151.152.254



I'm in quadrangle.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 08-25-2006 12:18PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Sun 08-24-2003 3:47PM
Posts: 1049
Location: Behind YOU!

Source: Kelly Hall
131.151.152.254 is likely the DSLAM (Digial Subscriber Line Access Milti-plexer). I'm going to guess that they [UMR IT] did this on the cheap to compete with the local business solutions such as AT&T. Fidelity is not terribly likely to be a contender without some major re-wiring of the buildings due to the nature of cable modem archetecture.

These units are a serious pain in the butt to configure. (Consequently I have on for sale with a 24-port SDSL card is anyone is interested.) It is likely a combination of poor configuration and the ammount of traffic flow.

_________________
"Why is it that we must always choose between certain death and probable death?" ~ Clank, Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri 09-01-2006 3:27PM 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Tue 08-15-2006 4:23PM
Posts: 7

Source: MST Wireless
kevintb wrote:
That's pretty cruddy.

My hop to nchc-90-rtr.network.umr.edu (131.151.251.102) is 2ms, 4ms, 2ms.

Its the first hop that's doing you in, the one to 131.151.152.254


My last hop to google is 72.14.207.99 right now, and its 60ms. Its about 60 miliseconds from 131.151.152.254 to google, so its likely whatever the heck is going on between your router and 131.151.152.254



I'm in quadrangle.


My router is not the problem. And its ip is the 192.168.0.x one, not the 131 one. I tried connecting directly to the dsl without router and it still is crappy.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat 09-02-2006 1:33AM 
Offline
Major

Joined: Wed 08-18-2004 6:51PM
Posts: 246

Source: Kelly Hall
Yeah so its not probably not your router. it could be anything from the wall to the IT router (152.254), but its likely that its the router. Maybe talk to IT?


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat 09-02-2006 2:49PM 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Tue 08-15-2006 4:23PM
Posts: 7

Source: Nagogami
oh and another thing I tried a different room in Nagogami and the results are the same, so I guess the whole Nagogami internet line is crappy.


Top
 Profile  
    
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group